Representative case studies
These nine structured profiles are deliberately selected anchors for recurring digital-safety mechanisms. They are not the complete evidence base and should not be used to infer frequency or trend.
Use All included reports to browse the full 71-report extracted corpus. The screening log records inclusion decisions, and the included-case dataset remains the row-level analytical authority.
Featured cases
| Case | PFD reference | Featured mechanism | Claim trace |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen Rhodes | 2026-0083 | Result presentation, filing and closure | CLM-001 |
| Eric Thompson | 2024-0323 | Abnormal result available but not accountably delivered | CLM-008 |
| Rachelle Ross | 2023-0067 | Missing computable screening non-responder status | CLM-002 |
| Alexander Braund | 2022-0407 | Amendment provenance across record representations | CLM-003 |
| Morris Reddington | 2021-0312 | ePRF access, receiving workflow and handover | CLM-004 |
| Stephen Stringer | 2024-0555 | Digital enquiry bypassed clinician and record | CLM-005 |
| Stephen Cassidy | 2023-0337 | Allergy unavailable across a care boundary | CLM-009 |
| Samuel Jordan | 2024-0056 | Recent temporary-practice record unavailable | CLM-010 |
| Audrey King | 2023-0312 | Paper-electronic medication workflow | CLM-015 |
Each profile separates the coronial concern, any respondent account, reviewer coding, limitations and Defence applicability. Reviewer codes and candidate Defence requirements are analytical layers; they are not attributed to the coroner.
Evidence status
All nine primary Judiciary reports were verified on 14 July 2026. Official responses are used where listed and remain explicitly distinct from coronial findings. Current product behaviour, wider prevalence and Defence-system applicability require separate evidence.