Selection and coverage flow
This page makes the current candidate dispositions and the bounded 2018 archive coverage visible in one place. It is PRISMA-informed reporting, not a claim of PRISMA compliance or a systematic review. The project remains a targeted evidence map and thematic case synthesis.
Current retained-candidate flow
flowchart TD
A["Retained candidates<br/>165"] --> B["Included reports<br/>112"]
A --> C["Excluded candidates<br/>53"]
D["2018 publication pages<br/>379"] --> E["Retained decision links<br/>36"]
D --> F["No retained disposition<br/>343"]
E -. "overlaps the retained-candidate log" .-> A
G["Later-migrated decisions<br/>1"] -. "outside the publication cohort" .-> A
The 165 candidate rows are unique report references retained for a decision; they are not the total number of search results seen across every surface. Every retained candidate has a completed current-pass decision: 112 are included and 53 excluded. include_interim means included in the completed current pass while final pre-submission rerun and independent review remain open.
The 2018 branch is a coverage overlay, not an additional 379 candidates to add to the 165. Its publication-year archive was completely enumerated and extracted, but only 36 rows link to retained contextual decisions (23 inclusions and 13 exclusions); 343 rows do not have a retained disposition and must not be described as documented exclusions. 1 later-migrated report decision sits outside that publication-year manifest.
Search-route accounting
Search routes may overlap before reference-level deduplication; this table counts each retained candidate once under its recorded route. The literal query and surface limitations remain in the linked protocol and audits.
| Search route | Date | Recorded query or route | Retained candidates | Included | Excluded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q-001 |
2026-07-14 | named anchor case | 4 | 4 | 0 |
Q-002 |
2026-07-14 | electronic patient record PFD | 9 | 9 | 0 |
Q-003 |
2026-07-14 | Summary Care Record PFD | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Q-004 |
2026-07-14 | electronic prescribing PFD | 14 | 14 | 0 |
Q-005 |
2026-07-14 | laboratory abnormal result alert PFD | 6 | 6 | 0 |
Q-006 |
2026-07-14 | EMIS SystmOne interoperability PFD | 12 | 12 | 0 |
Q-007 |
2026-07-14 | broad digital term discovery | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
2026-07-22 | Official Judiciary WP API update screen: electronic|digital|EPR|record|system|alert|referral|handover|paper|connectivity | 75 | 38 | 37 |
Q-009-UPDATE-EXTENSION-2026-07-22 |
2026-07-22 | Official Judiciary WP API extension screen: shared custody record|electronic observations|care-home electronic access | 3 | 3 | 0 |
Q-2018-AUDIT |
2026-07-15 | 2018 publication-cohort PDF/OCR search | 36 | 23 | 13 |
Q-2018-AUDIT-MIGRATION |
2026-07-15 | later-migrated Ref 2018 API check | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Recorded exclusions
These are the 53 retained candidates with an explicit exclusion decision. Reasons are reproduced from the canonical log rather than retrospectively collapsed into a new code. A future controlled exclusion taxonomy must retain this original detail.
| Report | Report date | Search route | Recorded reason | Reviewer note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jake Taylor — 2026-0251 | 2026-05-08 | Q-007 |
Search hit did not establish a clinical information-system component | Retain audit row |
| Ellie Herron — 2026-0226 | 2026-04-24 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
No identifiable digital, record or information-system mechanism | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Stephanie Link — 2026-0224 | 2026-04-23 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
No identifiable electronic, hybrid-record or information-system component; concern was an undelivered cross-site care pathway | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Thomas Mayhew — 2026-0225 | 2026-04-23 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
No identifiable digital, record or information-system mechanism | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Paul Hutchinson — 2026-0223 | 2026-04-20 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Fire alarm and telecare equipment were non-clinical technology | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Lisa Taylor-Penny — 2026-0220 | 2026-04-15 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Right Care Right Person policy and call-handler judgement lacked an identifiable information-system mechanism | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Roman Barr — 2026-0197 | 2026-04-03 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Duplicate publication of report 2026-0148; body, signature date and response deadline are substantively identical | Duplicate publication retained as an exclusion; use 2026-0148 as the report-level record and log the conflicting official reference |
| Alex Ganski — 2026-0180 | 2026-03-26 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Online drug purchase was not a clinical information-system mechanism; remaining concerns were generic care failures | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Clare Dupree — 2026-0181 | 2026-03-18 | Q-007 |
Automatic fire detection is outside clinical information-system scope | Retain audit row |
| Albert Bellingham — 2026-0176 | 2026-03-12 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Generic clinical-note omission without an identifiable electronic, hybrid or information-system mechanism | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Jacqueline Joseph — 2026-0102 | 2026-02-19 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Smoke alarms and CCTV were non-clinical technology | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Edward Hands — 2026-0097 | 2026-02-17 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Policy, staffing and paperwork failures lacked an identifiable digital or hybrid-record mechanism | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Lauren Moret-Dell — 2026-0059 | 2026-02-04 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Incorrect TIA referral pathway without an identifiable electronic or paper-electronic mechanism | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Nathan Cyster — 2026-0051 | 2026-02-03 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Road design, CCTV and online legal guidance were non-clinical technology | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Clive Hyman — 2026-0034 | 2026-01-22 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
No identifiable digital, record or information-system mechanism | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Tamara Logan — 2026-0035 | 2026-01-22 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
DWP workflow and standard correspondence were non-clinical information processes | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Peter Thompson — 2026-0018 | 2026-01-13 | Q-007 |
Handover concern located but no identifiable digital or record-system component | Retain audit row |
| Sundeep Ghuman — 2025-0625 | 2025-12-15 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
NOMIS and CSRA concerned operational cell allocation rather than a clinical or health-information workflow | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Katherine Wright — 2025-0624 | 2025-12-11 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Police premises-search policy without a relevant information-system mechanism | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Lewis Bates — 2025-0602 | 2025-12-01 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
The phrase systems issue described missing call-handler guidance, not technology or information architecture | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Tracey Oldfield — 2025-0578 | 2025-11-11 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Reference to a future IT upgrade was passing; the substantive concern was timely medication prescribing | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Aaron Taylor — 2025-0565 | 2025-11-06 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Psychology staffing and resource concern without an identifiable information-system mechanism | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Aaron Taylor — 2025-0566 | 2025-11-06 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
ACCT training and keyworker practice lacked an identifiable information-system mechanism | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Jennifer Cahill and Agnes Cahill — 2025-0559 | 2025-11-05 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Connectivity was a passing circumstance; the statutory concerns addressed home-birth guidance, staffing, skills and data collection | Passing-technology rule applied after full-text review |
| Kathleen Ward — 2025-0562 | 2025-11-03 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Bed capacity and palliative-care provision without a digital mechanism | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Raymond Leake — 2025-0546 | 2025-10-28 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Scan-booking omission and incomplete audit without an identified electronic or hybrid mechanism | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Mark Foster — 2025-0537 | 2025-10-23 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Test-order and clinical-decision failures without an identified information-system component | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Marc Davies — 2025-0525 | 2025-10-20 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Generic welfare-check documentation and handover without an identifiable digital or hybrid mechanism | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Abigail Jelley — 2025-0509 | 2025-10-13 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Training, commissioning, professional curiosity and culture without an identifiable information-system mechanism | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Richard Hunt — 2025-0498 | 2025-10-08 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Aspirating fire-detection system was non-clinical technology | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Georgia Barter — 2025-0491 | 2025-10-02 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Police National Database access for domestic-abuse policing was non-clinical technology | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Catherine Moore — 2025-0486 | 2025-09-25 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
The MOD vehicle-maintenance system was non-clinical technology | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Martin Collins — 2025-0497 | 2025-09-17 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Prison telephone monitoring was non-clinical operational technology | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Stuart Gilchrist — 2025-0460 | 2025-09-10 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
A physical choking-rescue device without a digital mechanism | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Thomas Hill — 2025-0387 | 2025-07-29 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Heater safety was non-clinical technology | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Azroy Dawes-Clarke — 2025-0391 | 2025-07-29 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Custodial emergency communication and paper forms lacked a sufficiently identified clinical information-system or paper-electronic mechanism | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Jacqueline Langworthy — 2025-0386 | 2025-07-18 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Platform-lift controls were non-clinical technology | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Sean Fitzgerald — 2025-0341 | 2025-07-08 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Police firearms operations and equipment were non-clinical technology | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Peter Ramsden — 2025-0467 | 2025-07-08 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Emergency-service powers of entry without an information-system mechanism | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Mark Ravensdale — 2025-0400 | 2023-05-16 | Q-008-UPDATE-2026-07-22 |
Generic referral and follow-up failure without identifiable information-system involvement | Official full text reviewed; exclusion criterion applied |
| Kurt Cochran; Leslie Rhodes; Aysha Frade; Andreea Cristea; PC Keith Palmer — 2018-0304 | 2018-12-19 | Q-2018-AUDIT |
An identifiable computer-system issue was present but concerned non-clinical security or operational technology rather than clinical information or health-IT workflow | Non-clinical technology exclusion |
| Jeroen Ensink — 2018-0235 | 2018-07-19 | Q-2018-AUDIT |
Police information systems were identified but the mechanism was non-clinical technology and did not concern a health-information workflow | Non-clinical technology exclusion |
| Adam Carter — 2018-0226 | 2018-07-12 | Q-2018-AUDIT |
Record-quality concern was generic and did not identify a digital clinical-information system or paper-digital boundary | Retained as a reviewed exclusion |
| Andrew Crane — 2018-0158 | 2018-05-22 | Q-2018-AUDIT |
References to systems and amendments concerned general process or policy, not a digital clinical-information system | False-positive system terminology |
| James Sheffield — 2018-0214 | 2018-04-12 | Q-2018-AUDIT |
Electronic records were described as a corrective measure already introduced; the outstanding concern concerned equipment-transfer protocol rather than digital design | Retained as a reviewed exclusion |
| Ivanika Olivari — 2018-0073 | 2018-03-07 | Q-2018-AUDIT |
Electronic records were used to obtain a telephone number, but the report identified no system-design, availability or digital-workflow defect | Passing technology use only |
| Paul Hanton — 2018-0021 | 2018-01-18 | Q-2018-AUDIT |
Amendment referred to policy or process, not electronic-record amendment or audit provenance | False-positive amendment terminology |
| Donald Till — 2018-0013 | 2018-01-11 | Q-2018-AUDIT |
Prior records were unavailable, but the report did not identify an electronic information-system mechanism or paper-digital boundary | Generic record-availability concern outside defined digital scope |
| Mark Doyle — 2017-0375 | 2017-12-18 | Q-2018-AUDIT |
Eligible SystmOne access mechanism, but the report date is outside the focused 2018 to 2026 boundary | Published in 2018; retained to expose publication-date versus report-date difference |
| Joseph Dunne — 2017-0371 | 2017-12-12 | Q-2018-AUDIT |
Eligible electronic-record deletion and audit-trail mechanism, but the report date is outside the focused 2018 to 2026 boundary | Official page title spells the name Joseph Dune; report-date exclusion only |
| Sarah Kiff — 2017-0407 | 2017-11-20 | Q-2018-AUDIT |
Eligible test-result and electronic-record workflow mechanism, but the report date is outside the focused 2018 to 2026 boundary | Published in 2018; retained to expose publication-date versus report-date difference |
| Brian Stannard — 2017-0394 | 2017-11-14 | Q-2018-AUDIT |
Eligible Lorenzo availability mechanism, but the report date is outside the focused 2018 to 2026 boundary | Published in 2018; retained to expose publication-date versus report-date difference |
| Peter Cotter — 2017-0388 | 2017-09-20 | Q-2018-AUDIT |
Eligible clinical decision-support mechanism, but the report date is outside the focused 2018 to 2026 boundary | Published in 2018; retained to expose publication-date versus report-date difference |
What remains open
- The wider 2019–2026 interval remains targeted, despite the reproducibly bounded 2025–2026 update screen.
- The 343 unlinked 2018 manifest rows require reasoned contextual dispositions before complete row-level screening can be claimed.
- Later-created or migrated pages with 2018 report dates require a full migration search.
- A final literal-query transcript and independent second review remain release gates.
Canonical records: screening log · included-case dataset · 2018 publication-cohort manifest · search protocol · 2018 search audit · validation queue