Skip to content

Oral presentation outline

Slide Time Purpose Evidence
1. Learning from patient harm 0:00–1:00 Military after-action-learning analogy and international question Review rationale
2. Evidence source 1:00–2:00 One-sentence explanation of PFD reports, mapped to mortality and sentinel-event review Source register and review protocol
3. Information present is not information acted upon 2:00–4:00 Stephen Rhodes and Eric Thompson anchors PFD 2026-0083; 2024-0323
4. Recurring sociotechnical hazards 4:00–6:00 Bounded mechanism findings and non-exclusive counts Case–mechanism map and included-case dataset
5. Why military pathways amplify them 6:00–8:00 Movement, civil-military care, multinational exchange, austere and disconnected operation Analytical translation
6. From concern to requirement 8:00–10:30 Three claim → mechanism → candidate requirement → assurance-test examples REQ- register and AST- catalogue
7. Transferable framework 10:30–11:30 Source → report → claim → mechanism → requirement → test Evidence-to-action framework
8. Conclusion 11:30–12:00 Known pathways to harm should be harder to repeat Synthesis

Speaker guardrails

  • Regulation 28 is the source, not the international headline.
  • Do not state that an EHR caused every death or that all deaths were preventable.
  • Explain UK terms once, then use international patient-safety language.
  • State that mechanism counts are non-exclusive and the published corpus is selected.
  • Keep DMICP as an optional, approved application rather than the abstract's headline.