Samuel Jordan

Identity and status

Coronial concern

At prison reception, the NHS Spine provided the permanent GP record rather than the more recent temporary-practice record containing mental-health treatment and medication information. The missing recent information contributed to an incomplete receiving assessment.

Respondent account

No respondent account is used in this case profile. The summary is limited to the primary Judiciary report and the review's analytical translation.

Reviewer-coded mechanism

The review codes this as administrative registration selecting an incomplete record source and implying a falsely complete longitudinal view. These are reviewer classifications:

• IDPOP and INT: permanent registration determined which source crossed the receiving boundary.
• VIS: the absent recent source and care period were not apparent in the received record.
• GOV: national and receiving workflows needed a control for source completeness.

Limitations

The case directly supports a mobile-population record-source hazard in prison reception, not a finding about military registration or DMICP. It does not establish how often temporary-practice care is omitted, current Spine behaviour in other workflows or the complete set of sources a receiving system should resolve.

Defence applicability

This is the strongest featured analogue for posted, attached, embarked, deployed and otherwise mobile personnel whose physical location, current care responsibility and administrative registration may differ. It informs REQ-001 identity and responsibility, REQ-002 population visibility and REQ-003 source completeness. Defence applicability remains an analytical translation.

Source documents

• SRC-021: Samuel Jordan PFD, Judiciary

Last verified

14 July 2026. Primary Judiciary report checked; the direct civilian mechanism and analytical military translation remain separated in CLM-010.